A Review of Functional Safety Models for Public Safety Management Systems

Authors

  • S. B. Aanandh Honeywell
  • Dr. Chinmaya Kar Honeywell
  • Dr. Nihal Siddiqui University of Petroleum & Energy Studies

Keywords:

models, SMS, FMEA, STAMP, FRAM, public safety, functional safety

Abstract

This paper reviews various models used for enterprise process management systems and public safety systems. These models include probabilistic functional safety models, accident models such as causal-sequential event-based models, systemic models such as failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), reliability models, systemic models such as systems-theoretic accident model and processes (STAMP) model and cognitive models, among others. These models, along with their advantages and disadvantages, are discussed in detail. Existing public safety management systems and enterprise process management systems are also compared. Functionally safe communication systems for public safety, including those using wireless telecommunications such as LTE for Public Safety, are also discussed. In addition, this paper also explains some of the evolving legislation regarding managed energy and managed safety for both process and public management systems.

Author Biographies

S. B. Aanandh, Honeywell

S. B. Aanandh completed a bachelor’s degree in electronics and communication engineering from Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai. He is a Certified Functional Safety Engineer for HW & SW Engineering in TUV Rhienland and is pursuing a Ph.D. in Public Safety Communication Systems Design with University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun. Aanandh is currently employed with Honeywell Technology Solutions as the Leader for Core Architecture and Re-use Engineering for Automation & Control Solutions, where he leads the initiatives on relevant core architectures, architectural evaluations and systematic design for re-use. He has authored nearly 25 invention disclosures in the areas of life safety, critical infrastructure protection and situational awareness. Aanandh has published two conference journal papers in chaotic cryptography and measurement instrumentation for yarn quality testing. He is also the recipient of Honeywell’s Global Technical Excellence Award.

Dr. Chinmaya Kar, Honeywell

Dr. Chinmaya Kar holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, a master’s degree in industrial engineering and management, and a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering. He has 11 years of research experience at various organizations, including Honeywell ACS Advanced Technology Lab, General Electric Global Research, INSA (Lyon, France), Crompton Greaves Limited and IIT Kharagpur, along with seven years of teaching experience. His interests include, among other things, reliability analysis and condition monitoring, as well as data analytics (such as decision support system, signal processing, statistics, etc.). Currently, he is a Honeywell Fellow at Honeywell Technology Solutions, where he is leading initiatives of condition monitoring and the Internet of everything. Dr. Chinmaya is collaborating in various initiatives on products/prototypes such as Asset Manager, Equipment Health Monitoring, Idler Monitoring, Compressor Blade Health Monitoring, etc. He is leading global projects such as WiBRATE (under the European Commmision’s FP7 grant) and Idler Monitoring under these initiatives. Chinmaya has authored nearly 20 publications in various journals and at conferences, holds 13 patents, two provisional patents, three trade secrets and nearly 36 disclosures (reports). He is a recipient of Erasmus Mundus Fellowship from European Commission and High-Value Ph.D. Fellowship from IIT, Kharagpur. He has also received several awards from Honeywell and GE — notably the annual Prolific Innovator award from Honeywell in 2012 and a management award from GE in 2007. He is a reviewer of journals such as IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Journal of Sound and Vibration, and Journal of Vibration and Control. He chaired sessions at the International Conference of CM/MFPT 2013, held in Poland. He is a certified vibration analyst Cat III and has certification in Six Sigma DFSS greenbelt. He has delivered a number of invited talks at different organizations.

Dr. Nihal Siddiqui, University of Petroleum & Energy Studies

Dr. Nihal Siddiqui completed his post-graduate work in environmental science and a doctorate in environmental biology. In addition, he also holds an industrial safety and post-graduate diploma in environmental impact assessment. The topic of his research was environmental impact assessment. Dr Siddiqui specializes in the area of environmental pollution, environmental monitoring and control techniques, and disaster management. He is currently associated with the University of Petroleum & Energy Studies, Dehradun, as the head of the Health Safety and Environmental Engineering Department. He was also associated with the Health, Safety and Environment Department of ICEM college, Muscat, Oman University of Central Lancashire, U.K. He has more than 65 research papers to his credit and has participated in several national and international conferences. Dr. Siddiqui has authored two books — Environmental Management Systems and Natural Resources and Handbook on Fire and Safety. Dr. Siddiqui has guided more than 50 M.Tech and seven Ph.D. theses.

References

Capsnet Strategic Plan. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from California Public Safety: http://www.caloes.ca.gov/PSC/Documents/PDF/CAPSNET_Strategic_Plan_03-03-2011.pdf.

Mannan, D. S. Environment and Public Works, June 27, 2013. Retrieved June 29, 2013, from Environment and Public Works: http://www.epw.senate.gov.

Turk, M. "Process Safety Management : Going Beyond Functional Safety," Hydrocarbon Processing, March 1, 2013.

International Electro-Technical Commissionl. IEC Smart Grid Standardization Roadmap, June 2010.

Graydon, J. C. Engineering, Communication, and Safety. Proc. 12th Australian Conference on Safety-Related Programmable Systems, Adelaide, Australia, 2007.

Leveson, N. Engineering a Safer World. MIT Press, Massachusetts, 2011. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8179.001.0001

Hollnagel, E. FRAM - The Functional Resonance Analysis Method. London: Ashgate, 2012.

Quereshi, Z. H. A Review of Accident Modelling Approaches for Complex Critical Sociotechnical Systems, Australia: Department of Defence, Australian Government, 2008.

OHS Body of Knowledge, Safety Institute of Australia. Models of Causation: Safety, Safety Institute of Australia, 2012.

Gas Association of New Zealand. SMS for Public Safety - Handbook for ESI & GSI Companies, Electricity Engineers Association, New Zealand, July 2011.

Visiting Commitee on Advanced Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Desirable Properties of a Nationwide Public Safety Communication System, NIST, 2012.

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers. Cognitive issues associated with process safety and environmental incident, July 2012, http://www.ogp.org.uk/pubs/460.pdf.

Lowe, Christopher. "A Human Factors Prespective on Safety Management Systems," Liv Systems, http://www.liv-systems.com/documents/A%20Human%20Factors%20Perspective%20on%20SMS.pdf.

Kaza, Siddharth and Hsinchun Chen. "Public Safety Information Sharing, An Ontological Perspective," Integrated Series In Information Systems,Volume 17, pp 263-282, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71611-4_14

U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Public Safety Architecture Framework, Vol. 1, 2 and 3, SAFECOM program. http://www.pscr.gov/outreach/archive/safecom_archive/psaf/psaf_docs.php.

Use Cases for Cognitive Applications in Public Safety Communications Systems, Wireless Innovation Forum, http://www.wirelessinnovation.org/psrfi

Osorio, Carlos A., Dov Dori, and Joseph Sussman. "COIM: An Object-Process Based Method for Analyzing Architectures of Complex, Interconnected, Large-Scale Socio-Technical Systems," INCOSE Journal,Wiley Online Library, April 27, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20185

Haimes, Yacov Y., Kenneth Crowther, and Barry M. Horowitz. "Homeland Security Preparedness: Balancing Protection with Resilience in Emergent Systems," INCOSE Journal,Wiley Online Library, June 16, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20101

Public Safety Canada. Emergency Management Planning Guide 2010-2011.

Hettinger, Larry and Marvin Dainoff. "Applying STAMP to Occupational Safety," MIT STAMP Workshop, 2013.

Sang, Yoa. "Applying System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) to Hazard Analysis," MASc Thesis. McMaster University, January 2012.

Gabbar, Hossam A. and Kazuhiko Suzuki. The Design of a Practical Enterprise Safety Management System, Springer Science+Business Media, 2005.

Knight, John C. and Patrick J. Graydon. "Engineering, Communication, and Safety," Proc. 12th Australian Conference on Safety-Related Programmable Systems, Adelaide, Australia, 2007.

Ribeiro, Cristina and Alexander Ferworn. "Computational Public Safety in Emergency Management Communications," Proceedings of the 6th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), June 28 - July 2, 2010.

Uslar, Mathias, Michael Specht, Sebastian Rohjans, Jörn Trefke, and Jose Manuel Gonzalez Vazquez. The Common Information Model CIM: IEC 61968/61970 and 62325 - A Practical Introduction to the CIM, Springer Science+Business Media, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25215-0

Use Cases for Cognitive Applications in Public Safety Communications Systems Volume 2: Chemical Plant Explosion Scenario: Wireless Innovation Forum, January 2010.

Downloads

Published

2014-10-01

How to Cite

Aanandh, S. B., Kar, C., & Siddiqui, N. (2014). A Review of Functional Safety Models for Public Safety Management Systems. Journal of System Safety, 50(3), 20–31. Retrieved from https://jsystemsafety.com/index.php/jss/article/view/199